A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1969"

1. Forging a private document;

A. On December 26, 2015, at the “E” store operated by D located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant, without authority, stated “F”, “G” in the column for purchase of the Handphone application site, “G” in the date of birth, “G” in the customer State column, “I” in the contact column, and “F” in the applicant column, and forged one copy of the application for mobile phone purchase in the name of F, a private document on the rights and obligations of the applicant column.

B. On December 26, 2015, the Defendant entered “J”, “K”, “K” in the customer address column, “J” in the applicant column, and “J” in the applicant column, and forged one copy of the application form for the mobile phone purchase under the name of J, which is a private document on the rights and duties of a private person, with the intention of exercising the right and duties at the said E store.

2. Exercising fraudulent and perjury documents;

A. At around 10:00 on December 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in the said “E store operated by the Victim D; and (b) notwithstanding the absence of any relationship with F and any intent or ability to pay a charge even if a mobile phone was purchased, the Defendant would purchase a mobile phone in the name of F and pay a charge normally.

“Along with the foregoing paragraph 1(a), an application for the purchase of a falsified mobile phone in the name of F, as described in the foregoing paragraph, was issued, and the equipment was obtained from the injured party the delivery of one mobile phone of the amount equivalent to KRW 1,130,800 at the market price on the same page from the damaged party and acquired it by fraud.

B. On December 26, 2015, the Defendant at the above “E” store around 14:30 on December 26, 2015, and even if the Defendant did not have any relationship with the J and did not have any intent or ability to pay the fee, the Defendant would normally pay the victim D’s employees “to purchase mobile phones under the name of the mother J and pay the fee.”

“Falsely speaking,” as described in the above 1-B.