A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forging a private document;

A. From July 2015 to August 2015, the Defendant: (a) was willing to arbitrarily open a mobile phone in the name of the victim E, a person who had performed one-time work at a “D” mobile phone store located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan; (b) from around July 2015 to August 2015.

On July 4, 2015, the Defendant arbitrarily opened two cell phoness under the name of E, and entered “E”, “E”, “F, Ulsan-si G in the Jeju-si,” and “E” in the applicant column in the LG Plus subscription column in the name of E, and signed E on each side of the following: (a) written consent for the use of personal information and the LTE Plus/3 agreement discount program; and (b) written application for LG Plus’ consent for the LG Plus’ consent for the use of the cell phone in the applicant column of the LG Plus’ consent (representative); and (c) signed and signed each E in another LG Plus subscription form in the same manner; and (d) written and signed each name in another LG Plus subscription application form.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant, without authority, provided two copies of a written application for subscription to LG Plus under the victim's name, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations.

B. From January 2015 to June 2015, the Defendant: (a) was a person who worked as a store at a “I” mobile phone store located in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si; and (b) was willing to arbitrarily open a mobile phone in the parent or relative name.

On January 26, 2015, the Defendant stated “J” in the subscriber name column, “K” in the customer address column, “L” in the customer address column, and “L” in each of the following: (a) up to June 25, 2015, the Defendant forged the victim J, the victim M, the victim N, the victim E, the victim E, and the victim’s mobile phone entry application in the victim’s name with the intent to sign and exercise his/her rights and obligations on the side of the J name; and (b) up to June 25, 2015, the Defendant respectively stipulated the victim J, M, the victim N, the victim E, and the victim’s mobile phone entry application in the victim’s name.

The defendant is therefore entitled to exercise.