logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.08.17 2016가합2080
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 30,000,000 to Plaintiff B and the period from March 11, 2012 to August 17, 2017.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The status of Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Defendant A and Defendant C, a female, are the father-child relationship.

Defendant D and E are co-owners of the building of the third floor above the F of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”), and have engaged in accommodation business using the trade name “Gel” on the second floor and the third floor of the instant building (hereinafter “the instant telecom”).

In addition to the regular stairs installed inside the building of this case, outside stairs connected to the third floor according to the outer wall of the building of this case (hereinafter “instant stairs”) were installed on the parking surface of the building of this case.

The calculation unit of the instant telecom was located on the second floor of the instant building, and the door entering the instant telecom through the instant stairs referred to as “afterwards” among the persons involved in the instant telecom.

Plaintiff

At around March 10, 2012, Plaintiff A and Defendant C entered into an agreement with Defendant D, E and the third floor of the building of this case and agreed to do so and agreed to do so. At around March 21, 2012, Plaintiff A and Defendant C agreed to do so.

Plaintiff

At around 22:00 on March 10, 2012, A and Defendant C participated in the drinking place between B and B in the instant telecom through the instant stairs, but completed the drinking place on March 11, 2012, around 01:30 on March 11, 2012, and arrive in the instant building on March 11, 2012, and at the same time, Plaintiff A was under the influence of alcohol and was in a state that it was difficult for her body.

Thus, as the defendant C was with the plaintiff as a shoulder with the plaintiff A, it was difficult for the defendant C to set up the 308 room through the instant stairs, but the door connected to the 3th floor could not be locked from the inside.

Accordingly, Defendant C tried to get off the ground again through the instant stairs.

However, Defendant C, who did not sit in the place of the Plaintiff A, is against the third to second floor of the instant building by receiving the Plaintiff’s bucks from the Plaintiff’s bucks.

arrow