logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.04.18 2018가단530818
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant Republic of Korea is the defendant Republic of Korea with each share listed in the separate sheet No. 1, out of 198 square meters prior to the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area AE.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 광주 남구 AE 전 198㎡에 관한 지적공부 1) ‘AF’ 토지에 관하여, 일제 강점기에 작성된 토지조사서의 소유자란에는 AG이 대정 4년 3월 20일(大正 四年 三月 二十日)에 사정(査定)을 받은 것으로 기재되어 있고 소유자의 주소란은 공란으로 되어 있다. 2) ‘AF’ 토지에 관한 지적공부는 멸실되었다가 1976. 5. 24.경 ‘전라남도 광주시 서구 AH 전 60평’으로 지적 복구되면서 소유자는 ‘AG’으로 기재되었으나, 소유자의 주소란은 공란으로 되어 있고 현재까지 미등기 상태로 남아 있다.

3) The “Yanam-do 60 square meters prior to AH was registered as “the instant land” on the land cadastre due to the change of administrative district and the conversion of the area of horizontal meters into the land cadastre, and the owner column entered “AG” on March 20, 1915. B. From around 1970, the Plaintiff occupied the instant land and cultivated the instant land from around March 1970 to the present time while cultivating gambling, drilling, and shotma, etc. on the instant land. C. A family register and inheritance relation 1) AAI’s permanent domicile is written as Nam-gu AJ, Nam-gu, Nam-gu. AG, the permanent domicile of which has the permanent domicile in the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju-gu AKdong, and there is no Dong name.

2) An AI died on February 16, 1959, and the remaining Defendants except the Defendant Republic of Korea inherited the property as shown in the annexed sheet No. 2 with the exception of the Defendant Republic of Korea’s heir relationship. The remaining Defendants’ inheritance shares except the Defendant Republic of Korea are as shown in the annexed sheet No. 3’s inheritance shares. [The facts without any dispute over the grounds for recognition, entry of Gap’s evidence No. 2 and No. 5, the inquiry results with respect to the L

2. Determination

A. Since 1970, the Plaintiff occupied the instant land from around 1970 to determine the remainder of the Defendants except the Defendant Republic of Korea. The Plaintiff’s possession is peace and peace as its owner’s intent.

arrow