1. Defendant Republic of Korea confirms that the ownership of Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J is 142 square meters prior to Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju.

2...

Basic Facts

The remaining-gu Seoul metropolitan area of 142 square meters prior to K (hereinafter “instant land”) is unregistered land. The old land cadastre concerning the instant land is registered as the owner with the assessment of L on March 19, 1915, and the address of the owner is in blank.

M was deceased on August 17, 1980, and there was wife N and A.O.

N was killed on February 3, 1981, and as inheritor, there was Q and Rousson B, a child between ASEAN and the former spouse P.

Q died on November 3, 1981, and the heir was his wife, S and unmarried couple C, and Australia, as well as Defendant D and unmarried couple, and Defendant E and F.

T was deceased on May 31, 2010, and there was a successor to the Defendant G, I, and J, who is the wife Defendant G, I, and C.

S died on May 8, 2011, and there is Defendant G, H, I, and J, the heir of Defendant C, D, E, F, and T, who are children.

The defendants' shares in inheritance shall be as stated in the "final shares in inheritance" column in the attached table of inheritance shares.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute against Defendant Republic of Korea, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, 12 through 23, and 25 (including the number with a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the entire purport of the pleading as to the defendants as to the remaining purport of the pleading: Confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act). Where the registered titleholder is continuously the same during the period of the acquisition by prescription as to the plaintiff's claim against Defendant B, C,D, E, F, G, H, I, and J, the starting point of the acquisition by prescription is sufficient to determine where the starting point of the acquisition by prescription is located where the registered titleholder is at the point at which it can claim the completion of the acquisition by prescription between the former possessor and the former possessor at the point at which the acquisition by prescription can be asserted. Thus, even in the case where the total period of one's possession has elapsed by succession of the former possessor and the total period of the possession has

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 97Da8496, 8502, May 12, 1998). A, 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, or 8.