Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On August 12, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant connects the Defendant’s house located in Yangju-si B to the Internet “C” online, and refers to the E Hospital operated by the victim D, and “I want to look at the Defendant’s house with the red blood cells and the short and short and short characters, even though she can see, but I want to do so.
“I” and “Is you as if you do both influoral labor fluor.”
In addition to inserting comments on “the victim”, a notice posted a total of 13 times to criticize the victim’s treatment, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, thereby openly insulting the victim.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.
On May 31, 2017, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victim revoked the Defendant’s complaint.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.