logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.15 2016구단10058
국가유공자(보훈보상대상자) 요건 재심의 비해당결정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 22, 1977, the Plaintiff entered the Navy as a noncommissioned officer, and was appointed as Staff sergeant on July 15, 1978, but was discharged from military service on August 31, 2002.

B. On September 3, 2002, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State by asserting that “on September 3, 1991, the head was frightened during the combat sports hours and was knee and knenee in the emergency exit training on September 7, 1998.” On March 18, 2003, the Patriots and Veterans Examination Committee approved “the credit scale scale, the right scale, the right scale, the right scale, the right scale, the first half of the half of the right scale, the second half of the half of the combat sports hours, the physical scale, the ability scale, the scaleology, the shock, the impulse, the depression, the 4-5th-5th external emergency exit,” and determined that the injury rating was a soldier or policeman on the ground of Grade 6(1) at that time.

C. After that, on September 16, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional registration with the Defendant stating that “the head was in the camping hole during the duration of combat sports on September 191, 191.” On the ground that the Defendant applied for additional registration on the basis of “the head (brain, cerebrovasty, cerebrovascular), saliv, and bridge,” and the Defendant cannot be deemed to have directly caused the occurrence of occupational duties or education and training directly related to the national defense and security or the protection of the lives and property of the people, and the Defendant cannot be deemed to have caused the occurrence of occupational duties or education and training during his/her military service, and on the ground that it cannot be deemed that the development or education and training has rapidly deteriorated at a rapid level above the level of progress due to the cause of performing his/her duties or education and training during his/her military service. D. Determination was made

The Plaintiff filed an objection against the foregoing decision on April 6, 2015, but the Defendant dismissed the objection on October 28, 2015.

E. On March 5, 2015, the Plaintiff rendered distinguished service to the State and rendered a non-conformity of the requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the head (in the case of this case, cerebral leum, cerebral cerebral celes) (hereinafter “the instant wounds”).

arrow