logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.15 2017구단218
국가유공자요건비해당결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 23, 1974, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from active service on January 25, 1977.

B. On May 19, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of soldier or policeman on duty with the Defendant on the ground that “A vehicle parked in 1975 through 1976 was faced with face, hair, and snow level, and the left-hand eye is real name after discharge, and the head is humf,” but on October 20, 2008, the Defendant rendered a decision corresponding to the requirements of soldier or policeman on duty on the ground that the specific and objective proof data against the Plaintiff is not confirmed.

C. On March 15, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that “the person was assaulted from his superior on or around December 1974, 201” with the Defendant, who applied for re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the State. However, on July 22, 2011, the Defendant rendered a decision that the proximate causal relation with the military performance of official duties is not confirmed, and the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit (Seoul District Court 201Gudan4249, Daegu District Court 201) seeking the revocation of the said decision upon objection, but was dismissed on January 27, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as is.

Then, on June 30, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant wounds”) with the Defendant claiming for “gal, ear, or head from his superior, who was aware of the fluoral shock from his superior around December 1974,” claiming that “the Plaintiff was suffering from gal, ear, or head” (hereinafter “instant wounds”). On December 20, 2016, the Defendant cannot be deemed to have caused the Plaintiff on December 20, 2016 as a direct cause for the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the national defense and security or the protection of the people’s lives and property, and (2) on the grounds that other military service or education and training cannot be deemed to have rapidly deteriorated due to the occurrence or the speed of natural progress, the notification corresponding to the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State and persons of veteran’s compensation.”

arrow