Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2014, the Defendant divided the criminal facts sentenced to two years and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of conflict at the Seoul Western District Court on December 10, 201, and the criminal facts sentenced to two years and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the concurrent treatment of concurrent crimes. However, the criminal facts of this case, which were subject to concurrent trial with the criminal facts of this case, are the criminal facts sentenced to two years and four months of imprisonment.

on December 18, 2014, the judgment became final and conclusive.

[2015 High Court Decision 2019] The Defendant, around August 24, 2014, at around 23:20, is an employee and a trial expenses from the main point of the trade name “C” located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as a matter of the drinking value.

12 reported to 112.

The Defendant, upon receiving a report from the Defendant, insultingd the victim E, who is a police officer belonging to the Seoul East Police Station D District District, who was dispatched to the said main place, in order to verify the details of the Defendant’s report, etc., without any justifiable reason, and to protect the employees F of the said main place and many customers, and made a public insult of the victim by having the victim “hump, typ, pump, pump, pump,” “hump, pump, pump,” and “hump, pump,” while the Defendant’s report is being

[2015 High 400] Around 02:40 on September 19, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims by publicly brupting the victim I and J, a police officer called the Defendant, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value at the Hart club located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by referring to the following: (a) whether the franch will be dismissed; (b) whether the franch will be discharged; (c) whether the franch will be discharged; (d) the franch; (b) whether the franch; (c) the franch, a democratic citizen would not desire the democratic police; and (d) franch bitch bitch bitch bitch, a fluor, a fluor, ach, a penal fluor, a penal fluor, and so on.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A statement of F and K;

1. Each complaint filed by E, I and J;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of the results of the Konet case search and output, and statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;