beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and six months and by a fine of five million won, and by imprisonment of one year and a fine of two million won, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A A A was a graduate of a medical college in the Philippines and was present at the Fump shop operated by Defendant B in Mapo-si around May 201 and was friendly to Defendant B with the knowledge of the fact that he was in the Fump shop operated by Defendant B.
Defendant
As above, A only graduated from a medical college and did not obtain a doctor's license, and Defendant B knew the above facts, Defendant B introduced Defendant A as a sexually explicit surgery against the customers who found the above shop, and actively recommended Defendant A to undergo the frynaxization procedure, and Defendant A decided to conduct the procedure, and Defendant A 80% of the profits accrued therefrom was 80% divided by Defendant A and Defendant B.
around January 17, 2012, the Defendants recommended Defendant B to introduce Defendant B to Defendant A as a sexual surgery and to undergo the surgery. Defendant A injected with an injection device around the snow of G, and received KRW 50,000 from G as a working expense.
B. The Defendants, around April 23, 2012, solicited Defendant B to conduct a procedure by the above method as seen above, and Defendant A injected Boxs using H injection equipment and injected PPCs into the clothes, and received KRW 2.10,000 from H as the cost of the procedure.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to engage in medical practice for profit-making purposes.
Summary of Evidence
1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement
1. The witness A’s legal statement (as to the defendant B)
1. Part of each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants
1. The police statement concerning G, and the police statement of H;
1. The defendant B alleged that he was aware of the fact that he was the defendant A at the time of each of the instant medical practices, but the court adopted and examined this case.