logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.01.14 2015고단3408
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 29, 2015, around 00:50 on September 29, 2015, the injured Defendant: (a) sought to move the Defendant into a room where another customer is located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the victim D (23 tax) who is an employee of the said main office, and (b) took around three times the parts, etc. of the said D’s face, and met with his face.

As a result, the defendant put the victim D on the left-hand side of the victim requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On September 29, 2015, at the main points specified in paragraph 1 around 01:14 on September 29, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and at the 1112 reported and dispatched to the site, the Defendant Crain and F, in order for the E District Assistant F, the Seoul Gangnam Police Station E District Assistant F, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of the 112

B. The Defendant 1 and the Defendant 1 were able to take the front part of the F, and the Defendant 1 and the Defendant 1 were arrested as an offender due to interference with the performance of official duties. The Defendant 1 and the Defendant 1 were able to walk the front part of the F on one occasion. The Defendant 1 and the Defendant 1 were arrested as an offender due to interference with the performance of official duties.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police patrol and criminal investigation such as arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D, F and G;

1. Images of the CCTV working in the E District and of the CCTV images installed in a main line;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that there is no previous conviction for the same offense, the fact that the crime of this case is reflected, and the result of damage from each of the crimes of this case is significant;

Normal consideration, such as the fact that it is difficult to see, the fact that the victim D agreed smoothly with the victim, etc.

1. Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Persons Ordering to Attend shall be dismissed.

arrow