logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.06.18 2013고단1002
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, from the date when this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A:

A. On April 3, 2013, the obstruction of performance of official duties and injury on April 23:3, 2013, the Guri Police Station and the police officer affiliated with the Guri Police Station that received 112 reports in front of the Guri-si, Guri-si, Siri-si, and the Guri Police Station D, a police officer affiliated with the Guri Police Station, and D, a police officer under its jurisdiction, expressed the face “Is up to her face” under the influence of alcohol, and expressed the face “Is up to her face?” The face is heeped at one time with the floor of the E, and assaulted the victim at one-time, obstructing the victim’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports, and at the same time interfere with the victim’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the victim’s 112 reports, and the victim’s injury, such as the non-number of treatment days’ diagnosis and injury, etc.

(b) at the time, time, and place of damage to public goods for the foregoing reason, and damage the public goods to cover KRW 532,715 in repair cost by taking a door to drinking and sprinking, at the price of drinking and sprinking, after burning the F patrol Team, which is a public goods upon arrest of a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason;

2. Defendant B, at the above time and at a place, attempted to open the door of the said patrol vehicle, and the slope H, a police officer belonging to the Guri police station G police box, expressed Malaysia the marith’s desire to “Ig to do so,” “Ig to do so,” and spathed with his arms once, and used flab, thereby obstructing the victim’s lawful performance of duties regarding the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and H;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, written estimates and opinions;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties)

1. Defendant A of ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

arrow