Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 22:30 on May 27, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as “F” at a convenience store working for the victim E in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as: (a) the victim’s large sound “influences,” the victim’s body is pushed away, and the victim’s body is pushed away, and the victim’s body is pushed up, thereby interfering with the calculation of other customers.

2. At around 22:40 on May 27, 2014, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim H, an employee of the G District in Seoul, the G District in Seoul, which was called upon receiving a report under paragraph (1) prior to the convenience store as stated in paragraph (1) and the background leading up to 112, as indicated in paragraph (1), and was reported by the victim E who is an employee of the said convenience store, and I, a neighboring owner of the frequencies, etc., with a large sound, “I am in the police, I am in this weather, and I am in this weather.”

3. On May 27, 2014, at around 22:55, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender with H around the G District located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul High Court G District in front of the G District; and (b) arrested him/her at the seat of the G District in front of the G District in front of the said G District; and (c) immediately after having taken the patrol at the said district, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties one time to walk the right shoulder and the right mouth of the said H on one occasion; and (d) on the same day at around 23:14 on the same day, he/she assaulted K around the situation where the said G District was seated in the front of the said G District by making him/her take a brine with two times of the working clothes and face of the said K.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement of the police officer to E, H, and K;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (a) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime