Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2019 Highest 175"
1. On December 21, 2018, the Defendant’s sole criminal conduct (e.g., theft at night) around 17:20 on December 21, 2018, when entering the “D precious metal store” located in Ulsan-gu B, Ulsan-gu, with a view to thefting precious metal, and then making use of a gap in the victim’s attention to purchase precious metal and making use of a gap in the market price owned by the victim’s attention and making use of a dial dial dial dial dial dial dial dials in the written indictment, which is the sum of the market price owned by the victim. However, insofar as the victim stated that the stolen object is “bals” (Evidence No. 111, 156, 312 of the evidence record), insofar as it does not interfere with the Defendant’s defense right, it is recognized as “bals.”
Two were stolen.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen property by intrusion upon the victim's structure at night.
2. Joint criminal conduct of the accused;
A. At around 22:00 on December 22, 2018, the Defendant, with E, F, and G, boarded the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gu H apartment, Ulsan-gu, U.S., with demanding the repayment of his/her debt from the Social Line E, E, and F, who is urged to pay his/her debt from the Social Line E, and F, refers to “whether he/she is able to get off and pay his/her fee,” and the pro-gu G located therein, with the foregoing F and G, was on board the car driven by E and moved to a nearby bar.
On December 22, 2018, at around 22:35, the Defendant: (a) entered the “K” operated by the Victim J (58 years of age) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) entered the said “K” with a view to parking the said vehicle on the alley-ro side and viewing the network, alone, with a view to parking the said vehicle, and (c) was stolen by the Defendant’s larceny and committing a special larceny by using this network (Evidence No. 1), one seized with a value equivalent to KRW 7,500, the market value of the victim’s own possession at that place is equivalent to KRW 7,500 (Evidence No. 1).
Accordingly, the defendant is in combination with G, E, and F.