beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Special larceny;
A. On May 26, 2013, at around 19:00, the Defendants pretended to be a customer in the F mobile phone store operated by the victim E in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and the Defendant B, by taking the same attitude that the victim would look at the mobile phone, left the victim's cell phone on a large number of types of mobile phones, and the locker line was placed in another place, and the Defendant A, at a different place, carried the locker, and the victim’s market price in the same place, was 90,000 won in white Samsung galthro-si, in which the victim’s market price is 90,000 won.
B. On May 27, 2013, the Defendants: (a) around 21:30, at the I precious metal shop operated by the Victim H located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) Defendant B drawing the employee J with a straw of precious metal, thereby concentrating the Defendant B with an employee’s vision; and (c) Defendant A drawing 18K posts equivalent to KRW 3,212,00,000 in the market price of the victim’s possession, which was displayed at that place, at KRW 3,437,00,000 in total; and (d) Defendant A drawing 14K boxes equivalent to KRW 2,225,00 in market price.
C. On May 31, 2013, at around 21:30, the Defendants 21:30, 2013, i.e., the instant I precious metal store operated by the Victim H, Defendant B emphasized his employees B with the starting line of his employees as if she saw the precious metal, and Defendant A used 18K posts equivalent to KRW 1,105,000 in the market price owned by the victim and 14K posts equivalent to KRW 675,00 in the market price and KRW 410,00 in the market price and KRW 2,190,000 in total.
The Defendants, together with the above, stolen the victims’ property at least three times.
2. On May 26, 2013, the Defendants were the victim M at L mobile phone agencies located in Ulsan-gu K on May 26, 2013.
As stated in paragraph (1), Samsung Tallon ju S3 mobile phones owned by the stolen victim E are sold, and the above mobile phone was false as Defendant A’s ownership.
The Defendants acted in collusion with the above and deception the victim to this end.