logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.03.21 2014고정51
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person driving B rocketing motor vehicles

On September 21, 2013, at around 11:20, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.090% of blood alcohol concentration 0.0%, and the Defendant was trying to drive the said vehicle that was parked adjacent to the 88th Franchisp 8th Franchisp, Sinpo-dong, and passed behind the vehicle which was stopped immediately.

At the time, there was no obstacle to securing the night and there was a motor vehicle parked in the street, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly operating the steering gear and brakes as a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to drinking, failed to properly operate the steering gear without keeping the distance from the motor vehicle at the front of the motor vehicle at the front of the motor vehicle by negligence, and caused the Defendant to shock the front right part of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle and shock the Defendant's motor vehicle back to the right side of the motor vehicle at the front side of the motor vehicle.

After all, the Defendant, by its occupational negligence, caused the Karen driver D(54 years of age) to suffer from approximately 3 weeks of cryp satum and bones satum in need of medical treatment, and at the same time suffered from the Garen E(19 years of age) with approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) was driven by the Defendant in the direction of 0.090% of blood alcohol concentration at the 88 mnives adjacent to the 88 malk-dong at the time of the temporary border as set forth in paragraph (1) from the 6m section to the repair repair computer front road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A survey report on actual condition (1) and (2);

1. The circumstantial report and the circumstantial report of the relevant driver;

1. Each written diagnosis of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing on-site evidence photographs.

arrow