logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.04.17 2019고단4181
위계공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven the above tourist bus from the upper school distance of Ansan-si, Masan-si on October 16, 2018, the Defendant was found to be the central bed and sent a notice of penalty to Ansansan-gu Police Station guard traffic, and the Inspector D affiliated therewith, while driving the above tourist bus from the upper school distance of Ansan-gu, Masan-gu, Ansan-si; and (b) received a notice of penalty, and (c) caused a strong complaint against the traffic control.

Thus, at around 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant reported to the 1119th day that “Arh is going to the right side of the patrol vehicle that the above police officer D boarded on the road in front of the Seocho-gu, Ansan-gu, the front of the traffic control place.” The above police officer D was partly defective in driving the patrol vehicle to start, and the Defendant was able to get the patrol vehicle in front of the left side of the patrol vehicle, so the latter wheels of the patrol vehicle was flicked with the Defendant’s launch, etc., and the latter wheels of the patrol vehicle was flicked as having the Defendant go to the right side of the patrol vehicle.” The Defendant reported to the 119th day to the effect that “I going to go to the right side of the patrol vehicle while going to the front of the above patrol vehicle.” The Defendant failed to operate the said patrol vehicle until the Defendant was dispatched to the front side of the patrol vehicle belonging to the Ansan-gu, and was sent to the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers for traffic control, public safety and maintenance of order through fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement (the occurrence of a traffic accident);

1. On-site photographs, tourist bus festivals and video CDs of the suspect A;

1. Requests for cooperation in investigation affairs (request for delivery of 119 first-aid services) reply, investigation reports (suspect A’s statement and black stuff image analysis) are alleged not to be intentionally posted under the patrol quis, but the above evidence and, in particular, according to video CDs installed on the Defendant’s bus, the above evidence and the video CDs installed on the Defendant’s bus.

arrow