1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows, and thus, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second sentence of “B Judgment” shall add to the following:

In regard to the fact that the plaintiffs expressed their intent not to file a lawsuit claiming money on the grounds of the violation of the letter of commitment to the defendant at the time of the preparation of the letter of commitment of this case, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the evidence No. 30, No. 1, and testimony by the witness Q of the first instance trial, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the defendant's assertion that the non-committee agreement was made between the plaintiffs and the defendant as to the violation of the letter of commitment of this

Article 24 of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 1750, Jun. 24, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 17588, Feb. 21, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 1750, Feb. 21, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 17588, Feb. 21, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 17581, Feb. 21, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 1750, Feb. 24, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 17817, Feb. 24, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 17817, Feb. 25, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 17817, Feb. 24, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 17500, Feb. 25, 2017).

As the sum of the consolation money and the reduced amount of damages as above recognition, the Defendant is a tort against the Plaintiff D in respect of KRW 24 million (=22,000,000 +2,000 +2,000,000) and of KRW 22,00,000 among them.