Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, on March 2017, leased Nos. 402, 403, and 404 of the Daegu Suwon-gu D Building No. 402, 403, and 404, and opened an officetel sexual traffic business establishment with no trade name to hire female women of E, who were introduced by Defendant B, such as Thailand No. 2, who had been introduced by the Defendant B, and the role of recruiting unspecified number of female sexual traffic through a studio mar application such as “F”, “G”, etc., and Defendant B moved the string female, who was introduced by non-name victims, into the above business establishment. After Defendant A and Thailand sexual traffic women, Defendant A and Thailand sexual traffic women were able to commission them to communicate with their female sexual traffic and instruct them to engage in sexual traffic, and the Defendants recruited to assist them to have sexual traffic with the above string women by receiving 90,000 won or 110,000 won.

Defendants from April 6, 2017 to April 12, 2017, including the fact that Defendants received KRW 110,000 from H, a man engaged in sexual traffic, who was recruited in the above 404 heading room of the above D building, and had them do sexual intercourse with the above E.

4. Until December, 198, sexual traffic has been mediated for business purposes.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act by a defendant A shall employ a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from April 6, 2017 to December 12 of the same month, did not have the status of stay that allows the Republic of Korea to engage in job-seeking activities, and the same month from April 11, 2017 to the same month.

4. Until December 12, 200, the status of stay expires, E was employed as a female of sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of each police officer in I and E;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against H and J;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure;