logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고단3721
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B, D, F, and G are punished by a fine of three million won, and Defendant C and E are punished by a fine of five million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a high water collection business, Defendant B is a restaurant operation, Defendant C is a heavy sea-dr, Defendant D is a non-duty, Defendant E is a judisian, Defendant F is a judisian, and Defendant G is a judisian.

1. Defendant A, Defendant D, Defendant D, and Defendant D, Defendant D, and Defendant E conspired to obtain insurance proceeds by intentionally providing traffic accidents with J, K (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) and intentionally. On November 10, 201, Defendant A driven MM5 vehicle in front of Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, Defendant D driving the NM5 vehicle, Defendant D driving the NM5 vehicle, Defendant E, the above J, the above J, and the above K driving the NM5 vehicle at the promised place, and Defendant A was aware of the traffic accident by intentionally towing the vehicle with the above SM5 vehicle. On the same day, the accident was caused by the traffic accident to employees of the victim Samsung F&M insurance company.

However, in fact, the victim company was not entitled to receive insurance proceeds from the victim company because there was no loss of personal injury caused by intentional use of the vehicle according to the conspiracy plan.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, in collusion with the above J and K, deceiving the victim as above, and the Defendants received total of KRW 7,086,260 from the victim on December 20, 201 as agreed money and treatment expenses, and acquired them by deception.

2. Defendant C, Defendant E, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G’s joint fraud with Defendant GO conspireds to obtain insurance proceeds by intentionally providing traffic accidents with O (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) and intentionally. On January 11, 2013, Defendant E driving a QNA car on the front side of the P apartment at Sungnam-si P apartment at Sungnam-si on January 11, 2013. Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant G, and the saidO driving a RNA car, and Defendant C, Defendant G, and the saidO moved to the said NASP car and moved to the designated place and agreed to do so.

arrow