Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant plans to obtain insurance money by deceiving the other vehicle driver and insurance company by using a “non-fast” method referred to as “non-fast,” which is an accident that intentionally receives a vehicle changing the course with friendship B, C, and D, which is one’s own possession, and the Defendant driven a E-fast motor vehicle, which is one’s own seat, and the Defendant intentionally caused an accident by using a vehicle in which “non-fast” is on board the back seat, and C, and D intentionally caused an accident, and then open the accident and subscribe to insurance money.

Accordingly, around August 21, 2016, the roads coming from the ICF station in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, in the direction of the DIC, and B found the Fcoke-do vehicle to change the course from the four-lanes to the three-lanes of the above roads, and driving the said teco-type vehicle on the front gate part of the above teco-type vehicle. The Defendants intentionally got open to the lower left part of the vehicle. After the occurrence of the above accident, the Defendants filed an insurance claim against the eco-owned fire & marine insurance company of the victim department of the above vehicle, and the Defendants received the total amount of KRW 5,696,080 from the injured party as the insurance proceeds.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, acquired 5,696,080 won from the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning suspect examination of the police against C or D (list 4, 6);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as details of payment of insurance proceeds (List 7);

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 347 of the Criminal Act, Article 347 of the same Act, and Articles 347 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The criminal proceeds of the defendant are more appropriate than the amount obtained by the above fraud, in a case where there is no confession of the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, reflective reflectiveness, and no record of criminal punishment other than once prior to the previous fine.