beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. A. Around 19:00 on April 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed, without any reason, the Defendant expressed, at the Defendant’s house located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul, that “The victim’s wife E (the victim’s age of 55), her wife (the victim’s age of 55), expressed that “the victim’s face and shoulder, etc. are sealed by hand; (b) the victim’s victim F (the victim’s age of 29) said victim’s her face and shoulder, etc.; and (c) the victim’s wife (the victim’s age of 24), her fingered the victim’s her hand on the ground that the victim’s G (the victim’s age of 24) said victim’s shouldered “the same ring” and her fingered the victim by hand.
(2) On May 23, 2014, the Defendant, at the same place as 23:30 on May 23, 2014, told the said victim E, without any justifiable reason, to take a breath of “culing and opening” and without any reason, assaulted the victims, i.e., when the victim F was able to take the head head of the said G on his hand on the ground that the victim F said victim F was able to take the head head of the said G on the ground that he was aware of the Defendant, and when the victim F was able to take the head head of the said G on his hand on his hand on the ground that the said victim G was her speech the Defendant, and that he was able to take the head head of the said G on his hand, and that he was able to take the face.
B. Around May 21, 2014, the Defendant threatened the victim E by stating, at the same place, that the victim E was a trial for divorce litigation with the said victim, and that the victim E “I am am able to am her only if a divorce is brought forward, and I am am son.”
2. Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Articles 260(1) and 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Articles 260(3) and 283(3) of the Criminal Act.
However, according to each written application submitted to this Court, victim E, F, and G wishing to punish the defendant on June 17, 2014 after the instant indictment was instituted.