logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.04 2015나12351
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 11,223,95 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from August 28, 2014 to September 4, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff leased a vehicle A (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”), and entered into a comprehensive automobile contract with the Plaintiff with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle under a limited driving agreement for at least 26 years of age, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with B as to the vehicle C owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”).

B. On April 2, 2014, around 16:25, 2014, the Plaintiff’s employee D is driving a three-lane of the Defendant Company B while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the other side of the road located in the mountain village of the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, U.S. in the middle of the Changwon-si. In the same way, the Defendant Company B is driving on the other side of the said road.

In order to avoid a collision with the defendant's vehicle, the driver's length of the F driver's F driver's vehicle, which is proceeding along the four-lanes of the plaintiff's vehicle by changing the lanes into three-lanes, and changing the two-lanes to the right side of the plaintiff's vehicle, and then the part of the steering part of the defendant's vehicle of the defendant's driver's vehicle was shocked into the front side of the plaintiff's vehicle.

E-motor vehicle F was shocked by the Rails installed on the above side of the road due to the shock after the collision with the plaintiff vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). C.

Plaintiff

D, as at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was under 26 years of age at the time of the instant accident, and the Plaintiff was not subject to the automobile insurance regarding the instant accident, and the same fire insurance company, which concluded the automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicles F for E driving, paid KRW 7,526,40, the repair cost of the Defendant vehicle due to the instant accident, KRW 2,130,00,000, and KRW 11,96,500,000, in total, for E driving vehicle repair cost, KRW 2,310,000.

The East Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff to claim compensation for the insurance money paid as above (Jansan District Court 2014 Ghana560304), and the above court.

arrow