1. Revocation of the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered under the judgment of the court of first instance.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to B (hereinafter “Defendant”).

나. 피고 차량 운전자는 2014. 7. 5. 11:56경 피고 차량을 운전하여 강원 횡성군 횡성로 7833부대 앞 편도 2차로 도로 중 1차로를 따라 진행하다가 2차로로 차로를 변경하던 중 위 도로의 2차로를 따라 진행하던 원고 차량의 운전석쪽 뒷범퍼 부분을 피고 차량의 조수석쪽 앞범퍼 부분으로 충격하였고, 그 충격으로 피고 차량이 좌측으로 밀려나면서 중앙분리대를 들이받고 튕겨 나와 다시 피고 차량의 앞범퍼 부분으로 원고 차량의 운전석쪽 뒷문 부분을 충격하였다

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). C.

On August 4, 2014, the Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 1,812,780 as insurance money for the repair cost of Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries or videos of Gap's evidence 1 to 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Assertion and determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The instant accident occurred while the Defendant’s vehicle was running along the first lane of the instant road, and the instant accident occurred due to the Plaintiff’s unilateral negligence on the part of the Defendant’s driver. As such, the Defendant, the insurer of the instant accident, is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the damages incurred by the instant accident and the damages incurred therefrom. (2) The instant accident occurred due to the Defendant’s negligence, which the previous Defendant’s vehicle, while changing the two lanes from the first lane to the second lane, and the latter Plaintiff’s vehicle was driven by shocking the Defendant’s vehicle without lowering speed. (3) The instant accident occurred due to the Plaintiff’s fault.