1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 3,408,00 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from January 6, 2014 to August 21, 2015.

1.The following facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the overall purport of the pleadings at each entry or video set forth in Gap evidence 2 to 5 and Eul evidence 3 (including the branch numbers for which the serial numbers are attached):

The Plaintiff is the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with C vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”).

B. At around 12:53 on January 6, 2014, D, driving the vehicle in front of the troke apartment in front of the Defendant, driving the vehicle in front of the troke apartment in the direction of the Gu, driving the vehicle in front of the Defendant, driving the vehicle in front of the troke apartment in the direction of the white-distance distance along one-lanes, driving the vehicle in front of the Defendant, driving the vehicle in front of the troke apartment in the direction of the white-distance distance, and driving the vehicle in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in front of the Plaintiff’s driver’s vehicle in front of the above road, coming into the center at the point where it was impossible to permit the U-turn located on the above crosswalk at the point where the said road did not reach the middle line, and the part of the Plaintiff’s driver’s vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the above road was shocked with the front direction of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the direction to the right end of the vehicle, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(hereinafter) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle without stopping, even though the vehicle signal, etc. on the crosswalk was yellow signal.

C. The repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident is KRW 1,760,00.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiff 1's assertion that the accident of this case occurred due to the whole negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle who carried out a U-turn with the central line even though the U-turn was not permitted, and the plaintiff suffered damages in total of KRW 1,760,000 for the repair cost of the plaintiff's vehicle and KRW 3,760,000 for the injury, and thus, the defendant, the insurer of the defendant's vehicle, is the insurer of the accident of this case.