logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2013.09.26 2013고단559
상해
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 18:00 on March 21, 2013, Defendant A discovered that G, the spouse of the Defendant, was seated in the above information room with the victim, with the her spouse, at the Fellet guide room operated by the victim B (50 years of age), Defendant A, at around 18:0 on March 21, 2013, he saw the victim’s left hand, plucked up the victim’s blaps, plucked up the victim’s blaps, pl up the victim’s left hand, and plicked the victim’s face by drinking.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), committed assault against the victim A (the age of 47) and assaulted the victim by putting him bather bat with bather hand with bather and bather, which is a dangerous object in that place, and bather dump (43 cm in length) with fating him/her toward the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A and B's legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness G, A and B;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A medical certificate (B);

1. Determination as to the assertion by the accused and the defense counsel of one CD

1. Defendant A

A. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact that the defendant A faces as stated in the facts charged, and there was a plucking, plucking and plucking spathing bran, but this constitutes self-defense or legitimate act by preventing the defendant A from hiding b's blaf.

However, according to the witness G and B’s legal testimony and the video of one CD, it is recognized that Defendant A was sealed with the wall that Defendant A obstructed his front, and that B’s face was taken by drinking.

In addition, according to each of the above evidence, it is recognized that Defendant A was plucking, plucking, and plucking, and Defendant A was a situation in which Defendant A entered the Mourter G in the state where he had already been made a Mourter in a state where he had already been made, and Defendant A used to assault and attract the Mourter G in a non-discriminatory manner.

arrow