1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) other than the fact that “No. 18” of the first instance court No. 4 of the judgment is deemed as “No. 22”, the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance; and (b) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Accordingly, the part of the plaintiffs' claim for confirmation of the right to passage over surrounding land among the plaintiffs' claim for confirmation of the right to passage over surrounding land among the plaintiffs' claim for confirmation of the right to passage over surrounding land has a benefit to seek confirmation as long as the defendant contests it. The part of the plaintiffs' claim for confirmation of the right to passage over surrounding land among the plaintiffs' claim for the main lawsuit is justified, and the part of the plaintiffs' claim for compensation and the defendant's counterclaim are accepted within the scope of recognition as above. The remaining part of the plaintiffs' claim in the main lawsuit, the part of the claim for compensation and the plaintiff's counterclaim in the main lawsuit, and the part of the plaintiff's other counterclaim in the main lawsuit, are dismissed as they are all without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of the first instance court.