Text
1. The plaintiff's lawsuit on the original construction of the defendant corporation is dismissed.
2. The Plaintiff:
A. The defendant corporation.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a party. 1) The Plaintiff is an apartment building of 402 units and ancillary facilities (hereinafter “instant apartment”) of the 152-ro 152 Oraong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.
For the efficient management and operation of the apartment, the autonomous management body is composed of the occupants. 2) Defendant Prine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Prine”) is the contractor of the instant apartment construction and the seller of the instant apartment, and Defendant Prine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Plue Construction”) is the contractor of the instant apartment construction and the contractor of the instant apartment construction. Defendant Prine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Plue Construction”) is the warranty contractor who entered into a warranty contract for the instant apartment.
B. On August 30, 2010, Defendant Original Construction Co., Ltd. (1) concluded a warranty contract and usage inspection on the following (hereinafter “instant warranty contract”) with the guaranty creditor as to the Defendant Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation and the instant new apartment construction (hereinafter “instant apartment construction”).
A) A contract was concluded with the Defendant’s Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation, issued a warranty bond from the Defendant’s Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation, and deposited it with the head of Chungcheong Gun, which is the authority for usage of the instant apartment. The warranty bond number 1067120-201-201-01301. From August 30, 2011 to August 29, 2011 to 836,691, 975 2067120-201-2001302. from August 30, 2010 to August 29, 2010 to August 29, 2010 to August 836, 2012; 91; 306710-2010-201,000-301 to August 30, 2010 to August 29, 2010 to 305-18.2010-106
3) On October 18, 2010, Defendant Pluxium received a pre-use inspection on the instant apartment, and around that time, the secured creditor of the instant guarantee agreement was changed to the Plaintiff. C. The occurrence of defects 1).