beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant Samdo Housing Co., Ltd.: KRW 158,004,437 and its related thereto from May 15, 2014 to August 11, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The plaintiff is the party. 1) The plaintiff is the 365 Dod Dod eng-dong 791 households located in the 365 Dod Dod e-ro, North-gu, North-dong, North-dong.
In order to manage the apartment house, Defendant Samdo Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samdo Housing Co., Ltd.”) is an executor who constructed and sold the apartment house of this case. Defendant Samdo Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samdo Comprehensive Construction”) is a contractor who newly constructed the apartment house of this case under a contract with Defendant Samdo Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samdo Comprehensive Construction”). The construction of the apartment house of this case was contracted from Defendant Samdo Housing, and the Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation is between Defendant Samdo Housing and
B. The guarantor who entered into a warranty contract for the instant apartment as stated in the foregoing paragraph is the guarantor.
B. On May 12, 2004, Defendant Samdo Housing Co., Ltd. (1) concluded a contract for the repair of defects and approval for use thereof, etc.) with Defendant Samdo Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant contract for the repair of defects”).
The term "Guarantee Form No. 0341204-201-000405 site number: Guarantee 001487 site number: Guarantee 218,376,450 won: Guarantee : from May 13, 2004 to May 12, 2014: Guarantee : Guarantee : the Specialist : from May 13, 2004 to 12, 2014; Guarantee : The Guarantee Do Housing is not liable for defects that occurred before the Guarantee : when the Council of Representatives is organized under Article 60 (2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act, the Guarantee Do Housing is deemed to have been changed to the Council of Representatives; and the approval for use of the apartment in this case has been obtained from the mayor of the Port on May 14, 2004; and thereafter, the Plaintiff, an autonomous management organization of the apartment in this case, constituted the Guarantee Agreement, changed to the Plaintiff in the instant port market.
C. The construction of the defendant Samdo comprehensive lawsuit related to the existing defect.