logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.04.26 2017구단78738
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on October 14, 2015 as a foreigner with the nationality of the Republic of Mameron (hereinafter “Mameron”) of the Republic of Mameron (hereinafter “Mameron”), with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit).

B. On January 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant, but on January 20, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition for refugee status refusal (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a possibility of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition on March 4, 2016, and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on July 18, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

가. 원고의 주장 원고의 외종숙(外從叔)인 B은 카메룬 대통령 경호실에서 근무한 경력이 있고, 현재도 군부 내 요직을 맡고 있으면서 보코하람(Boko Haram) 토벌에 중요한 역할을 수행하고 있다.

The plaintiff's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Family Affairs died in around 1989, and left a huge amount of inherited property at the time of death.

Before the death of the plaintiff, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs decided to allow the mother to inherit all the property of the plaintiff's mother, and the court of Kamera confirmed that the mother and his lineal descendants were in the status of inheritance of the property of the plaintiff's Mamera.

After all, the plaintiff's external mother and his lineal descendant completed all registration of the inherited property.

However, the plaintiff's external lodging B is the above.

arrow