(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.10.11 2018구단67124

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.10.11 2018구단67124

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on January 12, 2017 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) of the Republic of Mameron (hereinafter “Mameron”) of the Republic of Mameron (hereinafter “Mameron”).

B. On January 24, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on July 13, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On August 14, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on June 12, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is about 194 the name of the party in France, which is the party in the Republic of Korea in the 1994.

Party members were duly admitted as party members.

The plaintiff was present at the Limb, an open party hosting held in the Gimb, and the police arrested those who were on the spot due to a sudden habit, and the plaintiff was living in the Republic of Gabone (hereinafter referred to as the "Gabone") as the Republic of Gabone (hereinafter referred to as the "Gabal").

The Kameron Police, who participated in the hosting at the time, opens the list of persons who have escaped, and if the plaintiff returns to the Kameron of his own country, there is a concern that the threat of life or physical freedom may be posed by arrest.

Nevertheless, the defendant's objection to recognize refugee status is not accepted.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2018.10.04 2018구단66145

-서울행정법원 2018.08.16 2018구단11015

-서울행정법원 2018.11.01 2018구단11589

-서울고등법원 2018.08.22 2018누47716

-서울행정법원 2018.04.26 2017구단78738