A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On June 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the police officer of the Gyeonggi City Police Station C, who was under the influence of alcohol, and was dispatched to the Defendant on June 21, 2016; (b) “Ippon?” to the police officer of the Gyeonggi City Police Station C; (c)

C Haak fran, Maz. is well known.

Before doing so, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning police officer's security duties by assaulting, such as breathing flaps, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Public Duties (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Public Duties) (Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the basis of the sentencing criteria, such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflect

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Order.