A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 21, 2016, at around 04:00, the Defendant, along with B and C, did not count as the Defendant “F main point” operated by the Victim E (In this case, 49 years old) on the D2 floor at the time of the Gyeonggi City, the Defendant did not make the account that the Defendant, along with B and C, engaged in entertainment.

The Dominer Dominer ........ B shall have the beer's disease on the floor which was on the table, and the Defendant shall have the beer's tin.

”라고 위협하며 그곳에 있던 난로를 던질 것 같은 시늉을 하고, C은 큰소리로 욕설을 하는 등 소란을 피워 그곳을 방문한 손님들 로 하여금 그곳을 떠나게 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with B and C to interfere with the singing business of the victimized person by force.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1), and at the same time and place, received a report and received a notice from the police officer H and policeman I, who was called out, to the effect that he was arrested as a flagrant offender on charges of interference with duties, etc., with the duty of the police officer H and policeman I belonging to G District Group in the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station G District. Accordingly, the above police officer, who was faced with the Defendant, was at the time and place of the Defendant’s locking the Defendant, was her head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

3. On March 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 06:38 on March 21, 2016, the Defendant: (b) 513 at the cell of the Gyeonggi Gyeonggi Police Station, which was in a Yellow Doro-ro 513 at the Gyeonggi Gyeonggi Police Station; and (c) 55,000 won of the windows installed therein, during the disturbance, were taken as head and got the Defendant repair cost.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to the prosecutor by the J;

1. Each police statement made to E, I, and H;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to a written estimate damage to receipts and public goods;

1. Article 314(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense.