A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties has a D-tested car which is suspected of driving alcohol in front of the “C Company” company located in Silung-si B at Silung-si, 2018.

“A police officer F of the Singu Police Station E (a police box) who was sent to the scene after receiving a report 112, demanded the Defendant to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol and drinking. A police officer F of the Singu Police Station E (a police box) to take twice a part of the above police officer’s shoulder due to his finger, and demanded the said police officer to respond to the measurement of drinking again; “Is the name of the police officer, etc.”;

Do Governor, Do Governor,

Commissioner of the National Police Agency

“On the part of the police officer, she was frightened by cutting down one’s own shackers, she was frightened by having the chest of the police officer two times by hand and pushed down his body on the part of the ship.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

2. On June 25, 2018, the Defendant was driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as a sniffing, smelling, sniffing, sniffing, sniffing, sniffing, sniffing, sniffing, sniffing, sniff, on the face of the Defendant from the police officer F belonging to the above police box, while driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

There is a reasonable reason to determine a person, and it was demanded that the person comply with the measurement of alcohol using the method of inserting the whole in four minutes from around 02:17 of the same day to about 40 minutes, or blood collection method.

Nevertheless, the Defendant avoided the so-called so-called so-called a drinking measuring instrument by hand, and did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of H;

1. Refusing to take a photographic image of a mobile phone, or a motion picture of a mobile phone;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on the situation of the driver in charge);

1. Article 136(1) (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) of the Criminal Act and Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts.