beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On June 2005, Plaintiff A is a representative operating “D Child Care Center” (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”) on the first floor of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment management Dong with authorization for the establishment of a private child care center, and Plaintiff B is the head of the instant Child Care Center.
B. On February 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) conducted guidance and inspection on the instant childcare center (hereinafter “instant guidance and inspection”); (b) the Plaintiffs: (c) falsely registered infant care teachers E from June 1, 2015 to February 2, 2016; (d) claimed and received subsidies by means of false registration of infant care teachers E; (b) took care of the E’s children from June 2015 to February 2016; and (c) took care of the E’s children from June 2015 to February 2016; and (d) took care of the Plaintiff’s children in violation of the basic childcare fee support requirements; (c) failed to file a report on appointment and dismissal of cooks; (c) confirmed that special sports activities from 110:0 am to 6:0 am; and (5) from 140 am to 216:15 am to 2015 am; and (6) paid child care teachers.
According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and the entire pleadings, the grounds related to the disposition of this case are ①, ② reasons.
C. Accordingly, on May 9, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs on April 5, 201, and subject to the hearing procedure, issued an order for the closure of the instant childcare center facilities (hereinafter “instant order for the closure of the facility”), an order for the return of KRW 29,291,160 (hereinafter “instant order for the return of subsidies”) and the corrective order against the Plaintiff A, one year (from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017; hereinafter “instant order for the suspension of the principal qualification”) of the suspension of the president’s qualification against the Plaintiff B, and the revocation of the qualification as infant care teachers and their career experience (from June 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016), and an order for improvement and deletion.