logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.15 2017나15538
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The quoted trial of the first instance court was examined closely by the parties’ allegations and the evidence presented at the first instance court and the first instance court, but it does not seem that there was any error in the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

Part 2, 15 of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted in the KOSDAQ market.

The second 19th 19th 200 million won of the judgment of the first instance shall be "280 million won" and "280 million won."

Part 8 of the 8th judgment of the first instance court "the defendants" shall be applied to "the defendants".

The 8th 20th 20th 129,210,000 won of the decision of the first instance shall be written with "121,673,226 won".

The "7,526,00 won" shall be 73,03,935 won in the 8th sentence of the first instance court.

In addition, "the plaintiff" shall be added to "the plaintiff" between "the comprehensive ," "the window dressing accounting" and "the window dressing accounting" of the 9th judgment of the first instance.

The 11-13 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be deleted.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow