1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases or in addition, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[고쳐 쓰는 부분] ◎ 제1심 판결문 제2면 19행, 제4면 9~10행의 “이 사건 변론종결일인 2014. 7. 10.”을 “당심 변론종결일”로 고쳐 쓴다.

◎ 제1심 판결문 제4면 10행, 제5면 21행의 “1,119세대”를 “1,219세대”로 고쳐 쓴다.

◎ 제1심 판결문 제8면 15행, 제9면 13행의 “이 법원”을 “제1심 법원”으로, “감정인”을 “제1심 감정인”으로 고쳐 쓴다.

◎ 제1심 판결문 제9면 15행의 “453,718,741원”을 “453,538,741원”으로, 19행의 “2,207,365원”을 “2,027,365원”으로 고쳐 쓴다.

◎ 제1심 판결문 제11면 9행부터 21행까지 부분을 다음과 같이 고쳐 쓴다.

(3) The 1,258 household units mentioned in the 1,258 household units in the 127,614,819 won for damages in lieu of the defects in the front floor which conflict with the res judicata, among the defects in the 1,258 household units in the 1,258 household units, among the plaintiffs in the 1,258 household units, can not claim damages based on 325,923,922 won, deducting 127,614,819 won for the 1,258 household units in lieu of the defect repair in this case from the total 453,538,741 won for the 1,258 household units in lieu of the defect repair in this case. Since the 1,2200 household units filed the previous lawsuit, the damages amount is recognized based on 325,923,922 won for the 7 household units, and thus the res judicata effect of the previous lawsuit does not affect the defect repair in this case [Attachment 2].

B. The apartment of this case subject to the limitation of liability for damages is 13 years from the date of usage inspection to October 2013 when the appraisal of defects in this case was conducted.