logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.12.09 2020고단3037
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person engaged in the business of driving Bone Star bus driver in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the injury) and the Road Traffic Act (the non-accident after the accident)

At around 15:50 on July 11, 2020, the Defendant driven the above fluoring vehicle with the alcohol concentration of 0.142% in front of the GiIC marb on the front of the GiIC marp point in the front of the Giuri-si, Seoul Metropolitan City, and led the above fluoring vehicle to the East-gu glusium in the southyang-gu area.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by properly operating a driver who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle and properly manipulating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the steering gear on the right side and the right side and the right side side of the Defendant’s moving-on on the right side of the direction of the Defendant’s moving-on, DK3 Driving of the Victim C (Nam, 31 years old), which was under way on the right side of the Defendant’s moving-on.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as seen above, sustained injury to the above victim and the victim E (the age of 28) who was accompanied by approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment. At the same time, even if the above K3 car was damaged to move up to KRW 637,00 in repair cost, and went away without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping it to rescue the victim.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) was driven by the Defendant at the section of approximately 22 km from the section of approximately 22 km to the same Si/Gu dong-dong, Changdong-dong, Jindong-dong, Jindong-gu, Gyeonggi-do, through a road in front of the Kindong-gu, Gyeonggi-do, the Gyeonggi-do, the Gindong-si, Gyeonggi-do, to the 98-4 Seoul, the Gindong-gu, the 22km of alcohol concentration from the road of approximately 0.142% of blood alcohol concentration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C.

arrow