logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.16 2017구합55923
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Circumstances and details of the decision;

A. School Foundation B (hereinafter “B”) is a school foundation established for the purpose of providing secondary education, which has established and operates Cmiddle Schools and D High Schools under its jurisdiction.

On September 1, 2013, the Plaintiff was appointed as a school teacher of Cmiddle School on September 1, 2013, and was transferred to D High School on March 1, 2014, and was employed as a school teacher of B for about three years.

B. The Inspector General of the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education conducted an audit of early B, C, and D high schools in 2016, and the Superintendent of the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education requested B to cancel the appointment of the Plaintiff on June 14, 2016.

C. B On August 7, 2016, upon the Gyeonggi-do superintendent of education’s revocation of appointment, notified the Plaintiff of the cancellation of appointment as a teacher for the following reasons.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant revocation of appointment”). The chief director recommended a specific teacher in the course of study to be qualified as a career counseling teacher through an interview with his or her children, and the relevant teacher applied for the final decision and training, and was selected as a person subject to final training.

In addition, the Cmiddle School did not hold the teachers' personnel committee to recommend persons eligible for career-related counseling instructors, prepared the minutes on July 16, 2012, and kept them with signature of the chairperson and the executive secretary.

Although it was found that the recruitment process of teachers was formulated the "Employment Plan for Public Offering Planning", the original document was lost, and it was found that it was impossible to verify the conformity of the grading sheet with the grading sheet by making it difficult to verify the original document after preparing the grading sheet in the essay marking sheet.

In 2013, the method of disclosure and employment was changed to the first (defensive), second (defensive), second (defensive), second (defensive), and second (defensive), without public announcement.

arrow