1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

. The Plaintiff determined that it is difficult to perform his/her duties in a fair manner. At the time of 2016, the Plaintiff entered the interview room and asked questions to the effect that he/she is not an interview member with the intent to employ a new employee E, among those subject to the interview, thereby hindering the fair examination of other interview members. - The Plaintiff violated Article 5 of the Code of Conduct for Officers and Employees by participating in the interview although he/she is a director and an interview with the person related to his/her duties and should avoid duties. - The Plaintiff was the head of the agency responsible for securing fairness and objectivity in personnel affairs, such as conducting an interview with E, 2016, and at the time of 2G interview with the head of the 2G head of the 27th 16th 2nd 10th 2nd 16th 2nd 16th 16th 16th 20 of the 2016. 7th 2nd 2nd 2016.

The plaintiff was called to the purport that he was in violation of the rules on avoidance of a person related to his duties even though he was related to G, and G was finally passed at the second employment of new staff in 2017.

(b) improper commissioning B shall be commissioned by Article 20 (Advisors, etc.) of the Personnel Regulations and advisory members, etc.