Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
Of the instant lawsuit, unpaid wages, unpaid annual allowances, etc.
Reasons
1. The validity of a basic fact and a comprehensive wage agreement among the reasoning of the judgment of the court in this Court is identical to each corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff is entitled to the payment of retirement allowances, wages, annual allowances, and refunds of health insurance refunds, health insurance deposits, and year-end year-end refund in 2015, as indicated below.
(See Plaintiff’s preparatory brief dated 4, 2018, see: (a) the Plaintiff sought an additional portion of Nos. 4 through 7 in the table below from the trial; (b) the date of the retirement of 1 retirement allowance for the title amount (won) as of January 3, 2016; (c) the calculation as of January 3, 2016; (d) the calculation as of January 4, 2016; and (e) reflection of the amount of ordinary wage per wage per wage hour of 2015, 7,034,363, 303,2324, 1,675, 584, 506,680, 506, 507, 417, 205, 1401, 2015, 1,303, 2015, 1,303, 232424, 2016.
3. Items 1 and 4 in the table of Paragraph 2. 2. Determination of legality of a lawsuit (the principle of prohibition of disadvantageous alteration does not apply to the matters to be examined ex officio) and part of damages for delay in part
A. While only the Plaintiff appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance as to whether the part concerning the claim for damages for delay until January 6, 2017 among the instant lawsuit was lawful, the provisions of Article 385 of the Civil Procedure Act that the change of the judgment of the court of first instance can be made within the scope of filing an objection, are not applicable to the matters to be investigated ex officio, regardless of the party’s request (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Da14817, Jul. 25, 1995). Accordingly,
1. The bankruptcy procedures provided for in Part III of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act are all assets of the debtor to all creditors.