(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2017.07.25 2016가단55132

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2017.07.25 2016가단55132

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 4,056,321 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from April 29, 2016 to July 25, 2017.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant B’s passenger ship C (149 tons; hereinafter “instant passenger ship”) operated by Defendant Mine Transport Co., Ltd. on April 28, 2016.

2) While operating the instant passenger ship with the captain, the captain of the instant passenger ship at around 12:40, the captain of the Jindo-gun D-gun, Jindo-gun (hereinafter “the arrival of the instant passenger ship”).

2) The Plaintiff, at the time of arrival in the instant passenger ship, she met the instant passenger ship at the arrival of the instant passenger ship. 2) The Plaintiff, in Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, Jin-gun, had two rubber slickers open on each hand in order to deliver the instant passenger ship to his her wife, and had two rubber slickers slick on each hand in order to leave before the vessel slick on the instant passenger ship located at the arrival of the instant passenger ship, while leaving a glick on the vessel slick on the instant passenger ship, while leaving a glick on the vessel slick on the instant passenger ship, suffered injury, such as damage to the right side slicks that require treatment for about five weeks by leaving the vessel slick on the instant passenger ship.

(A) The sea where the arrival of the instant passenger ship 3 had a strong water sprink, and the instant passenger ship sprinked in front and rear by water was sprinked in front and rear, and the route connected to the arrival of the instant passenger ship from the ship splate to the instant sea surface was sponsed by a slope, and the Plaintiff could be able to be faced with the accident by getting off the ship splate in front of the instant passenger ship at the arrival of the instant ship, and the Plaintiff was at the front of the vessel splate, and the vessel splate was at the front of the instant passenger ship. Thus, the Plaintiff was at the front of the vessel splate, and the vessel splate was at the front of the instant passenger ship, and thus, the Plaintiff was at a dangerous situation by the edge of the vessel spacking the vessel splate.

However, Defendant B, at the arrival of the instant vessel, had the Plaintiff exercise due care, even though the Plaintiff appeared to have observed the situation in which the vessel lamps of the instant passenger vessel was set off in front of the vessel lamps.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.04.17 2013고단1934

-광주지방법원 해남지원 2014.12.10 2014고단344

-대법원 2014.7.10. 선고 2013두27500 판결

-인천지방법원 2008.10.28.선고 2008고정3831 판결

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.12.04 2015고단1017