logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.08.10 2016가단240788
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff A with KRW 99,29,076, and KRW 5,000,000 to Plaintiff B, respectively, and KRW 3,000 to Plaintiff C, D, and E.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B are legal couple, and under the chain, Plaintiff C, D, and H, who are minor children.

Defendant medical corporation F (hereinafter “Defendant Medical Foundation”) is operating the J Hospital in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Incheon, and Defendant G is a doctor employed by J Hospital.

B. On February 27, 2016, Plaintiff A complained of “procacy” as her source to J Hospital, and was subject to A’s family history, etc. at J Hospital on March 12, 2016 due to A’s family history, etc.

As a result of such inspection, the plaintiff A was diagnosed with approximately four meters right upper m of the size of 4m, and was recommended by the defendant G to conduct an internal climatic surgery by operating method.

At this time, the plaintiff A seems to have desired a direct climatic climatic cliff, which is capable of removing the seeds safely and completely even if there is a scarbly, but the defendant G selected an internal clibr clibr which does not remain separately from the scarbr.

On April 5, 2016, Plaintiff A started an operation to treat A’s upper ray cancer (the submission of an operation to the right upper line to both sides, along with the central forest cutout of the same side) under a general anesthesia; Defendant G made a space where both the two sides of the two sides of the two sides of the Plaintiff A was cut off to enter the inner border (0.6 cm) by cutting off the diameter (1.2cm) and the two sides of the two sides of the two sides of the Plaintiff A; then, Plaintiff A damaged Plaintiff A’s right upper ray in the course of the process of booming the two sides of the two sides, along with the central dog of the two sides, damaged Plaintiff A’s right upper throde and the two sides of the two sides; after confirming ne damage, Plaintiff A was converted to the direct controlling method through the skin flagr, thereby performing the entire flaging surgery with the right flag flady and the entire fladyne surgery.

C. At present, the plaintiff A shall keep to the right on a permanent basis due to the damage to the right-to-side neutism.

arrow