1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) is the Fproductive female.

(2) The Defendant D served as a medical specialist in the internal medicine at the Defendant hospital, and Defendant E served as a medical specialist in the clinical path at the Defendant hospital.

B. Plaintiff A’s internal source guard and spathic 1) Plaintiff A was not properly controlled, and on July 24, 2012, Plaintiff A visited the internal and external surgery of the Defendant Hospital and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on July 26, 2012 to undergo the insulgic therapy. (2) Plaintiff A was diagnosed by the A upper level functional sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgic sulgics.

C. On July 30, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted the first malpha-ray test with the Plaintiff Company A on July 30, 2012. As a result, approximately 0.553 cm on the right upper line x 0.472 cm x Defendant D’s relatively low nosea-ray m. (2) on the same day, Defendant A conducted the second malpha-ray test, and Defendant E inspected the Plaintiff’s cell tissue recovered from the said test, and as a result, Defendant E expressed a doubt that the upper malpha is suspected.

3. Accordingly, Defendant D explained the result of the inspection and the necessity of the Gap-ray cutting-out to the plaintiffs, and requested a compromise to the outside department of the Defendant Hospital in order to coordinate the operation time.

On August 2, 2012, Plaintiff A had been before and after August 3, 2012, in order to undergo the upper-board surgery, and received the upper-board vessel cutting surgery on August 3, 2012. The Plaintiff’s right while undergoing the surgery.