1. Defendant E: (a) KRW 800,000 for Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from October 30, 2013 to February 13, 2015, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant E is Defendant F-owned vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant F-2 vehicle”) to arrange vehicles at the parking lot of H restaurant located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jung-gu, Seoul, with a view to arranging the vehicles at around 20:10 on December 10, 2010.

) While driving the said vehicle in order to park in another place and driving it in the direction of the weak area, due to negligence in the backside of the backside of the Defendant 2’s vehicle, the part of the J vehicle of the Plaintiff A, which was stopped to enter the right side of the side of the Defendant 2 vehicle, was shocked into the rear side of the Defendant 2 vehicle, thereby causing the Plaintiff A to suffer sculmatitis (hereinafter “first accident”).

(2) On December 9, 201, K driving a L vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 3”) around 10:50 on December 10, 201, and neglecting its duty of safe driving while approaching toTol in the luton Highway located in the Pluton Zone in Sungnam-si, thereby neglecting its duty of safe driving. Accordingly, Plaintiff A driving a vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of Plaintiff C with the rear part of Defendant 3, and the collision between Plaintiff C and the rear part of the J vehicle on the front part of Defendant 3.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second accident”) Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A, and Defendant Music Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Co., Ltd”).

(A) is an insurer which has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to Defendant 3 vehicles. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (each entry, including serial numbers, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

B. According to the facts of recognition 1 above, Defendant E is liable for damages arising from the primary accident as the driver of Defendant 2’s vehicle, and Defendant E is liable for the damages arising from the secondary accident as the insurer of Defendant 3 vehicle.

On the other hand, the Plaintiffs are Defendant E and Defendant Company with respect to all damages arising from the instant primary accident and the secondary accident.