logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.10.14 2016나12852
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, "commercial buildings" in Part 10 shall be "commercial buildings" (hereinafter referred to as "commercial buildings in this case").

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, "H" in Part 11 of the judgment of the second instance is changed to " Q".

From No. 4 of the judgment of the first instance court No. 3, up to No. 4 of the same page, the term “commercial building” means that “this case’s exchange wind (hereinafter referred to as “the exchange wind”) was occurred in the rupture of the attached drawings installed at the N main points located in the commercial building of this case.”

The testimony of the witness A and theO in Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court is "the testimony of the witness of the first instance court and the result of the plaintiff A's personal examination of the first instance court".

Each "Expert T" in the 5th, 6th, 15th, 8th, and 10th of the decision of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "Expert T", respectively.

On 5th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "O" of the 15th of the judgment of the court of first instance was sold by R in 2014 by the automatic exchange method of U manufacture around 2014.

"At the first instance court's witness's testimony" means "at the time of changing the statement that P has dealt with the summons made by the Defendant in the R originally operated by him only, but P has dealt with the summons made by U from the year 2014 in which P installed the summons of this case." "At the time of the first instance court's 5th judgment, the witness's testimony cannot be reversed."

“A person shall not be subject to a single determination.”

(O) The witness of the first instance court stated that the part mentioned in the trading statement issued by S in collaboration with R is not I or S, but is well known to anyone, and it is not I or S... It is doubtful whether the transaction listed in the trading statement was actually made or not.

arrow