A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of repairing and selling a computer in the name of “C” in the Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City building B.

At around 13:00 on March 28, 2014, the Defendant purchased one of the HP E-owned market value equivalent to 500,000 won, which was the victim E, that he stolen from D.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade in a medium and high-computer, has a duty of care to verify whether the defendant is stolen by ascertaining the identity of D and recording the details of acquisition of the Nowon-do, motive for sale, and the price suitable for the transaction price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who neglected such care and neglected to make a judgment on the stolen, acquired stolen goods by purchasing 60,000 won of the above Nowon-gu one by negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination of suspect suspect regarding D by the prosecution (written examination of suspect regarding D twice);

1. A report on investigation (a relative investigation of any thief further by a suspect);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of seizure (No. 20 No. 50);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 364 and 362(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines (i.e., confession, the fact that damaged goods have been returned, the fact that the same criminal record exists once, the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.