logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.18 2013고정4640
업무상과실장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the trade of computers in the trade name of Jongno-gu Seoul apartment zone 108 to “C”.

1. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim D around April 8, 2013, purchased Samsung Nomt North Korea, the market price of the victim D, which he stolen from E, from the above store E, was equivalent to one million won.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of trading a medium-sized computer, has a duty of care to clearly verify and describe personal information such as E's resident registration number, mobile phone number, and to verify whether he/she requests the details of the acquisition of the Nowon-gu and the price suitable for the transaction price, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to pay the above attention and neglected to determine the stolen goods, but purchased the price of 110,000 won for the two North Koreas due to negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by occupational negligence as above.

2. Around May 6, 2013, the Defendant, who committed a crime against the Victim F, purchased from the above store E a 1.5 million won worth of the market value of the victim F that he stolen from E.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of trading a medium-sized computer, has a duty of care to clearly verify and describe personal information such as E's resident registration number, mobile phone number, and to verify whether he/she requests the details of the acquisition of the Nowon-gu and the price suitable for the transaction price, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to pay the above attention and neglected to determine the stolen goods, but purchased the price of KRW 170,000 for the two North Koreas due to negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by occupational negligence as above.

3. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against Victim G, who was stolen from E at the above store on or around June 24, 2013, was a victim G owner of the damage, one million won worth at the market price.

arrow