logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.01.30 2019나3883
공사대금
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Of the instant lawsuits, KRW 6,195,552 and the said money on July 12, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a stock company engaged in the manufacturing business of wooden households, etc., and the Defendant sells the furniture, metal furniture, etc. with the trade name of “C,” and the Plaintiff has been supplied and built at the Defendant’s request from around 2016.

B. From February 2, 2018 to August 2, 2018, at the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff paid KRW 70,680,50,000 to the Plaintiff totaling KRW 58,850,00 ( KRW 20,000,000 on January 5, 2018) ( KRW 11,00,000,000 on April 14, 2018) to the Plaintiff for construction work, which supplies and installs furniture, etc. at the construction site including Pyeongtaek D three stories (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant construction”). The Defendant paid KRW 58,850,500,00 on November 6, 2018 as the instant construction work price.

C. On April 22, 2019, the Defendant received the instant decision on performance recommendation, and paid the Plaintiff KRW 5,000,000 as the construction price in addition thereto.

E A. On July 5, 2019, the High Government District Court Decision 2019Kadan323, the High Court Decision 2019Kadan323, the debtor is the plaintiff, the third debtor is the defendant, the amount of the claim 6,195,52 won, and the provisional attachment order against the plaintiff among the claims against the defendant in accordance with the lawsuit of this case, which is the amount of the above claim amount until it reaches the above claim amount (hereinafter referred to as the "provisional attachment order of this case"). The original provisional attachment order of this case was served on the defendant on July 11, 2019.

E. On October 30, 2019, the order to seize KRW 441,691 from among the claims that the Plaintiff has against the Defendant according to the instant lawsuit, E was issued a collection order (hereinafter “instant collection order”), and the original copy of the instant seizure collection order was served on the Defendant on November 5, 2019.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap Nos. 1, 2, and .

arrow