beta
Cases
2010Nu42753 Charges for the use of port facilities
Plaintiff-Appellant
* Company
Defendant Appellant
The Commissioner of the Bupyeong-gu Port Office
The first instance judgment
Suwon District Court Decision 2010Guhap4866 Decided November 11, 2010
Conclusion of Pleadings
April 29, 2011
Imposition of Judgment
May 27, 2011
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The imposition disposition of user fees for each harbor facility shall be revoked by the defendant on the plaintiff, as stated in the imposition details by the head of Pyeongtaek-gu Port Office.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges
The presiding judge, the judge and the Gangwon-gu
Judges Jeon Soo-jin
Judges fixed-age
Attached Form
A person shall be appointed.
A person shall be appointed.
A person shall be appointed.